From discussion of black lives matter protests to the role of visual narratives for ethical/epistemological questions about complex truths and the qualities of antiviral materialities, the discussion touched on key dimensions of the crisis. The mobilities perspective uniquely allows connection and multi-scalar analytical fluency in ways that can illuminate the complex and cumulative momentum of minor phenomena.

Some of the discussion is documented on ‘Padlet’

There are no passenger flights, the streets are filled with birdsong, in some countries  and the air is clear: a silver lining at a time of great tragedy. In fact, the mass (im)mobilisation of Covid-19 is set to enable the . However, so far, the response to the pandemic has at best been to ignore this astounding achievement, at worst, it has sought to reverse it. Why? How could it be otherwise? 

Karl Polanyi and the collapse of society 

Covid-19 is . Hypermobility, the marketisation of healthcare, decades of disinvestment in resilience, inequality and the growth of precarious work worldwide have all created perfect conditions for viral spread. Alongside dependence on fossil fuel and insatiable consumption, they are also implicated in the much deeper crises of climate change and environmental destruction. These energetic political, and economic origins of our time, captured by economic historian Karl Polanyi as the mechanisms of The Great Transformation (1944), spell collapse.  

Writing in exile during the Second World War, Polanyi foresaw that â€˜to allow the market mechanism to be sole director of the fate of human beings and their natural environment â€¦ would result in the demolition of society’ (p. 76). Against the odds, societies now are rallying for survival. As governments articulate responses to the pandemic, even conservatives acknowledge that . This has brought back the state, with its intervention in how people live their lives, run their businesses, support their employees. Such interventions are part of good governance in crisis and enable powerful leadership in wrestling the system-ness of epidemiology, economy, and everyday life. More, and more globally coordinated intervention is likely to be necessary to address climate change and environmental crises. 
 

Changing mobility systems of transport, consumption, finance, and information in response to Covid-19 has been a matter of banning all but essential travel, protecting workers, , borrowing billions to support struggling individuals and businesses as well as developing countries, and prompting Facebook to implement fact-checking. This has made possible an unprecedented reduction in carbon emissions, and that could be for good. 

Living virtually 

Changes in everyday living are translating alternative concepts of , , drift economies, virtual travel and   into the fabric of society. Virtual forms of travel for work, socialising, e-commerce, and learning in particular, are driving a . Before Covid-19, about 3% of US citizens regularly worked from home. Now business analysts estimate that .  

These changes inspire optimism. But mobilities research shows how digital travel does not just substitute for physical journeys, but may, in fact, . The new mobility patterns are temporary and soon potentially subject to intense surveillant contact tracing, threatening civil liberties. At the same time, there is talk that â€˜â€™, coupled with determined efforts to â€˜reopen economies’ with demand stimulus packages, . These measures could waste a precious opportunity to stop business as usual. 

Reducing emissions 

To meet the 1.5° carbon reduction targets set in Paris, the 2019 UN Emissions Gap Report shows that . Covid-19 has made the impossible possible and given us a 4% reduction head start for 2020, together with a sobering sense of the enormity of the challenge. Unprecedented state intervention and new economic, social, and cultural practices have been mobilised to make this happen, inspired by a deep sense of crisis. What does it take to stretch this powerful humanity shown by political leaders and members of the public alike to address the threat to survival that the climate and environmental crises pose? 

. From 2030, climate change is estimated to cause  (WHO). The World Bank projects that climate impacts could . These crises are accompanied by a  of xenophobia, inequality, poverty, and discrimination, as well as the .  

We are in the midst of societal transformation, hurtling down two very separate forks in the road ahead.  now matters vitally. On one side, people are racing to deepen Polanyi’s first great transformation, clamouring for a return to normal, , inciting competition and tolerating the collapse of developing nations. On the other, people are realising that enough is enough, supporting vital societal services, the importance of state intervention, global collaboration and less physical and more virtual mobility. By acting on our new visceral understanding that , and how , as John Urry puts it, we have a unique opportunity to make the current mobility transformation the beginning of a new, great transformation that is good for humanity and for the planet.  

 by . Used under a  license 

Twitter: @mbuscher @cemore4mobs 

Monika Büscher, Centre for
Mobilities Research, ¶¶ÒõAPPµ¼º½

Other mobilities are possible. But will a systemic shock
engender systemic change?

Covid-19 (aka Coronavirus) has shut down air travel and the global economy,
and incited a mass-move online to work, meet, and socialise. When the
catastrophe is over, will some of the lessons, values, and new practices stick?
Early signs are not promising.

As the news is dominated by Covid-19, the climate, pollution, and
environmental crises seem forgotten. Indeed, mobility systems ‘naturally’ seem
deserving of billion Dollar rescue packages, even though they are causally
implicated in the death of 7 million people from air pollution per year
worldwide (),
40,000 a year in the ,
and climate change that will impoverish, displace, and kill more than 240
million people by 2050, whilst incurring $520 billion losses ().
Might the viral mobilities of Covid-19 eclipse these other crises?

In our current media discourse they already do. The virus is feared in ways
that mobilises instant, worldwide societal and economic transformation. In
contrast, the threat of looming systemic has inspired very little action. It is the
multi-causal system-ness of the climate, pollution, and environmental crises
that has stopped a mobilities transformation so far. That hasn’t changed.

To change mobility systems, more than disruption is needed.

Learning new ways of living, working, and socialising locally and online is possible and not enough. We also need deeper understanding of, and more mobilities research on: public understanding, reasoning and sense-making practices around system-ness and precarity, causality and responsibility, courage and creativity, social movements and mobile publics, collective and individual capacities for translating understanding to transformation. For more reflections from other mobilities scholars, see the

.